U.S. Policy has been based upon the fact that globalisation and economic growth would ease censorship and repression in Socialist China. But it hasn't.  The Chinese continue to expand their Socialist propaganda and censorship. The Google incursion involved a serious cyberattack on the Gmail accounts of human rights activists.  Remember that Yahoo had actually helped Chinese authorities to find a dissident which resulted in his arrest and incarceration for 11 years.
The moment is set for confrontation on a global scale about the importance of Freedom of Speech and censorship In this article, "Why America and China will Clash," you can see how the issue of censorship remains with the recent Google confrontation.
The president’s recent set-piece speech on Asia was a classic statement of the case for US engagement with China – complete with the ritualistic assertion that America welcomes China’s rise. But, after being censored by Chinese television in Shanghai and harangued by a junior Chinese official at the Copenhagen climate talks, Barack Obama may be feeling less warm towards Beijing. An early sign that the White House is hardening its policy could come in the next few months, with an official decision to label China a “currency manipulator”.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch is the author of numerous books on Radical Islam. He visited mosques in Britain recently and commented upon the chilling effect of the Islamization of Britain on Free Speech.
In fact, when I returned to the George the next night with the producers of the film, we were not allowed entry because the previous night we had been discussing jihad and Islamic supremacism.
Were the proprietors of the George Restaurant hard-line Leftists who viewed jihadists as their allies in the struggle against American imperialism? Or were they frightened by the prospect of the local Muslims, who live in that area in considerable numbers, exacting revenge against the place for daring to host a meeting of the Resistance?
Most likely they were afraid of their own government, which frowns upon those who question the wisdom or viability of the multicultural paradise they are intent upon creating. For when we finally tried to assemble in another place a roundtable of concerned British citizens to discuss the problem of the Islamization of Britain, one by one the British participants dropped out. If they appeared on camera, we were told, the government could and probably would threaten their livelihood.
If the British government makes the stakes too high for its own people to speak publicly against the policies that have brought into Britain thousands of people intent upon destroying the British state and imposing Islamic law, then all is nearly lost.
|
Google's search results seem to readily denigrate Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism and Buddhism but not Islam?
Â
Religion always causes a stir when it is debated, and Google seems to know it. Google is not taking a fair approach to the way that it handles searches for different religions.
When you search for the major religions of the world, the monotheistic faiths for example, Google serves up suggestions for the search “Christianity is” such as, “a lie,” or false.” Try it on a a number of faiths, and then Islam.
Notice any difference?
Google is systematically blocking, it seems, all search suggestions for Islam. Why? To remove the chance of an adherent of the faith from being offended by a perhaps severe search suggestion? Why not treat all search terms equally?
Given the complete lack of suggestions, not just terms that could be perceived as negative, it seems that Google is covering its, well, behind.
GO TO THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE TO SEE THEIR GRAPHIC.
|
|
|
Here is an actual article relating to the guy in prison for life for protecting his home. You may have heard of this in the 90’s. Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk, England.
You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door.
Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. Â At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way.
With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. Â You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. Â In the darkness, you make out two shadows.
One holds something that looks like a crowbar. Â When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. Â The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. Â One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.
As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.
In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Â Yours was never registered.
Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died.
|
|
Read More-Click Here
|
|
Action:Â Debunk Fake Statistic that Spur Hysteria on the 2nd Amendment
Fake Statistics spur the left-wings ban on gun ownership. In debunking a commonly held notion that gun ownership is "18x" or "43x" or whatever more dangerous than not owning a weapon, several studies point out the prejudice of the 'scientific authors' of these articles Among their worthy observations are:
|
|
|
Is a firearm in your home "22 times more likely" to be used to kill or injure a family member than to be used for protection? Or "43 times more likely?" How about "18 times more likely?" Anti-gun groups and politicians say it is, citing research by Arthur L. Kellermann, M.D.
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 4 |
How Stuff Works - CPR (337)
Ready.Gov - Homeland Security Website (277)
Gun Owners of America (320)
Online CPR Training and Certification (332)
Master CPR (285)
American Red Cross (254)
CodeRedRover.org (295)
NOAA Education (308)
U.S. Fire Administration for Kids (270)
FEMA Info (296)